英国达人秀
习近平同约旦国王阿卜杜拉二世会谈_我的网站

一 | 中新社北京8月24日电 8月24日下午,中国国家主席习近平在北京人民大会堂同来华进行国事访问的约旦国王阿卜杜拉二世举行会谈。
习近平指出,中约建交以来,始终相互尊重、平等相待、互利合作,是不同社会制度、不同大小国家合作共赢、交流互鉴的生动写照。2015年,我们共同宣布建立中约战略伙伴关系,开启双边关系发展新篇章。

二 | 面对变乱交织的国际和地区形势,建设更具内涵、更有活力的中约关系符合两国人民共同期待,也顺应全球南方联合自强的大势。双方要弘扬传统友好,增进战略互信,深化互利合作,密切多边协作,推动中约战略伙伴关系得到更大发展,不断为地区和平、稳定、繁荣作出积极贡献。
习近平强调,中方重视约旦在地区的独特和重要作用,坚定支持约旦维护国家主权、安全、发展利益,愿同约方密切政府、政党、立法机构、地方等各层级交往,加强治国理政经验交流。

Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle Photo: Courtesy of China's Supreme People's Court Guangzhou Maritime Court recently successfully mediated a 180 million yuan ($25 million) dispute arising from a collision between two oil tankers in waters near the Strait of Hormuz, with both parties agreeing to apply Chinese law and submit their dispute to the Chinese court, the Global Times learned from the court on Sunday.
In 2025, two crude oil tankers collided at the eastern entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, 24 nautical miles off Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, media reported.
Owned by oil tanker operator Frontline, the Liberia-flagged vessel
Front Eagle collided with the Antigua and Barbuda-flagged vessel
Adalynn on the morning of June 17, 2025.
The
Adalynn was damaged in the fire. While the
Front Eagle was undergoing repairs in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong Province, Global Shipping Holding Ltd., which owns the Adalynn, applied to Guangzhou Maritime Court for its arrest. Frontline provided a cash security of 203 million yuan to release the arrest and applied to establish a limitation fund for maritime claims.
The court approved the application and allowed Frontline to establish the limitation fund, setting the amount of the fund at 168 million yuan.
Guangzhou Maritime Court held four pretrial conferences on October 11, 2025, January 12, May 6 and July 13, 2026 to complete preparations for evidence examination, technical investigations and reported the relevant pretrial arrangements to the provincial high court, the Global Times learned from the court.
The court held a public hearing for the case on July 14, 2026.
No government agency had conducted an investigation into the collision, and no official findings were issued after the accident. Taking into account the unique burden-of-proof challenges in maritime collision disputes, Guangzhou Maritime Court took measures to preserve key evidence when handling the vessel arrest, including navigation logs, AIS data, voyage data recorder (VDR) records and CCTV footage, the court told the Global Times in a statement on Sunday.
Under a process that involves exchanging evidence inventories, sealing materials simultaneously and jointly reviewing them after evidence submissions, the court helped ensure the authenticity of critical records and laid the groundwork for determining the facts of the case.
As the two sides and their respective maritime experts reached sharply different conclusions over liability, the court introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism, with the consent of both parties, allowing technical experts to participate throughout the proceedings. Drawing on the preserved evidence, investigators reconstructed the collision, assessed the vessels' encounter situation and clarified the parties' respective responsibilities.
Following the hearing, the court facilitated mediation, and the two parties reached a settlement agreement on July 27, 2026. On July 31, the court organized the distribution of the maritime liability limitation fund among creditors involved in the foreign vessel collision dispute and related charter-party disputes.
Representatives of the
Adalynn traveled from overseas to the court to present a letter of appreciation and a commemorative banner in recognition of the court's efforts, according to the court statement.
After the Guangzhou Maritime Court accepted the case, both parties agreed to apply Chinese law to establish a maritime liability limitation fund and resolve their substantive dispute, breaking away from the long-standing reliance of international shipping disputes on European and US courts and legal systems.
Choice of justice Bilov Viacheslav, a representative of Global Shipping Holding Ltd., told the Global Times that the main reason they chose a Chinese court to mediate the case is that "we want absolutely fair, unbiased approach to this issue. Because nowadays in this world, there are some countries which believe that they are authorized to give instruction to all others, which definitely is having influence on the decisions of the judge on the approach to the case."
Viacheslav gave the Chinese court's handling of the case a five-star rating, saying he had expected the dispute to take at least three years to resolve, but the Chinese court settled it within just one year. He also praised the judges and lawyers for their commitment to advancing the case throughout the proceedings.
"The judges and lawyers worked to advance the case with the same level of commitment as I did, even though the case directly concerned my own interests. This left a deep impression on me about litigation in China," Viacheslav said.
The case involved two foreign parties and a collision that occurred near the Strait of Hormuz, with no direct connection to China or Guangzhou Maritime Court initially. The fact that the parties chose to seek vessel arrest in China and agreed to apply Chinese law demonstrates the credibility and appeal of China's maritime judicial system, Wu Guining, vice president of the Guangzhou Maritime Court, who served as the presiding judge of the case, told the Global Times.
The court also introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism in the case, an innovation aimed at addressing complex technical issues arising from vessel collision accidents, Wu said, noting that through technical investigations, the court was able to establish the facts of the case more efficiently, highlighting the integration of professional maritime investigation capabilities with China's specialized maritime adjudication system.
The case demonstrates China's ability to handle major, complex and cross-border maritime disputes with professional expertise, Wu said.
The handling of the collision between the two vessels is just one example of how Chinese courts have been dealing with a growing number of foreign-related maritime cases in recent years.
The Global Times learned from China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) in October last year that over the past 40 years, Chinese courts have handled a total of 88,000 foreign-related maritime cases involving parties from 146 countries and regions.
At a lecture held by the SPC on Friday, Shen Hongyu, director of the Fourth Civil Division of the SPC, told the Global Times that in recent years, Chinese courts have become more influential in participating in and promoting global ocean governance reform. Maritime justice serves as an important instrument for practicing the vision of a maritime community with a shared future and for advancing the reform of the global ocean governance system.
。中约合作本质是互利共赢,双方要进一步深化发展战略对接,加强经贸、基础设施建设、交通、矿产等传统领域合作,拓展数字经济、人工智能、绿色能源等新合作增长点,全方位深化教育、文化、科技、旅游等交流,扩大人员往来,增进民心相通。

三 | 中方愿同约方一道践行四大全球倡议,加强在联合国等多边机构协调和配合,共同维护以联合国为核心的国际体系和以国际法为基础的国际秩序,推动构建人类命运共同体。
阿卜杜拉二世表示,中国是一个伟大的国家,在习近平主席领导下取得巨大发展成就,令人钦佩。

四 | 约旦和中国建立了强有力的战略伙伴关系,双方始终相互尊重、密切协作,各领域合作取得丰硕成果。约方坚定奉行一个中国政策,认为台湾是中国领土的组成部分。约旦高度重视对华关系,致力于同中国深化经贸、制造、农业、科技、医药、文化、教育等领域合作交流,欢迎更多中国企业赴约旦投资,实现共同发展繁荣。约方高度评价习近平主席提出的四大全球倡议,期待中国在世界舞台上发挥更重要的领导作用。

五 |
两国元首就中东地区局势交换了意见。

六 | 习近平强调,中方一贯主张全面停火止战,通过政治外交途径化解争端,认为包括约旦在内地区国家的主权和安全应当得到尊重。巴勒斯坦问题是中东问题的核心,推动解决这一问题应坚持4点原则:一是必须坚持政治解决,锚定“两国方案”这一正确方向,推动巴以重启和谈,实现巴勒斯坦早日独立建国;二是必须坚持“巴人治巴”,巴勒斯坦是所有巴勒斯坦人的家园,应秉持“巴人治巴”原则推进约旦河西岸治理和加沙战后重建;三是必须坚持人道主义,国际社会特别是联合国安理会应该切实负起责任,保护平民安全,确保人道主义援助,制止人道主义灾难;四是必须坚持公平正义,以国际法治为基础,以标本兼治为目标,以务实行动为路径,推动巴勒斯坦问题早日实现全面、公正、持久解决。

七 |
阿卜杜拉二世表示,约方高度赞赏中方在中东事务中一直秉持公正立场,支持阿拉伯国家正义事业,中方的正义立场对地区国家非常重要。约方愿同中方保持密切沟通,继续为缓和当前局势作出积极努力,让中东各国人民安享和平与繁荣。
会谈后,两国元首共同见证签署外交、经贸、产供链、司法等领域多项合作文件。
双方发表《中华人民共和国和约旦哈希姆王国关于深化中约战略伙伴关系的联合声明》。
会谈前,习近平在人民大会堂北大厅为阿卜杜拉二世举行欢迎仪式。
阿卜杜拉二世抵达时,礼兵列队致敬。

八 | 两国元首登上检阅台,军乐团奏中约两国国歌,天安门广场鸣放礼炮21响。阿卜杜拉二世在习近平陪同下检阅中国人民解放军仪仗队,并观看分列式。
当晚,习近平在人民大会堂金色大厅为阿卜杜拉二世举行欢迎宴会。
王毅参加上述活动。(完) 【编辑:张子怡】。
Current article:http://lichuorenrenyitankanmeimu.cfd/list_3q0324/yij4.html
Published on:17:59:31